Не хватает времени на чтение полной статьи? Прослушайте краткое содержание за 2 минуты.

The Old Logic of Relocation No Longer Works

For decades, factory relocation was a spreadsheet exercise. Cheaper labour, lower taxes, and relaxed regulation were enough to justify a move. But that world has changed.

Today’s supply chains stretch thin across geopolitical fault lines. Boards now worry less about labour cost and more about production risk. Shipping delays, compliance pressure, and IP vulnerability have turned globalisation from a growth lever into a liability.

And yet, many German manufacturers are still treating relocation like a cost play. The result? Delays, reversals, and stranded investments.

From Cost Arbitrage to Strategic Risk

The firms leading the next industrial wave are no longer chasing the cheapest country. They are asking smarter questions: Where are my core assets safest? Which operations need proximity to R&D? Where can I ensure ESG traceability?

That is why Germany is back on the factory map. Not for everything, but for the things that matter most.

Why the New Industrial Footprint Includes Germany

Germany isn’t “too expensive” anymore. It’s just expensive for the wrong kind of thinking.

I. Germany’s Emerging Strengths

The country now offers:

• Deep talent pools in automation, AI, and mechatronics
• Regulatory stability that attracts ESG-focused capital
• A growing ecosystem of innovation clusters (batteries, hydrogen, e-mobility)
• Location advantages for final assembly, digital twin testing, and customer proximity

Boards seeking more control, visibility, and flexibility are placing strategic bets inside Germany again. And not just Mittelstand firms – multinationals are relocating product lines to Stuttgart, Dresden, and NRW, blending proximity with precision.

II. Blended Models Gain Traction

No one is putting their entire production base in one location. The modern model is modular:

• Germany for final assembly, prototyping, AI-integrated production
• CEE (Slovakia, Romania) for component supply and volume production
• MENA (Tunisia, Egypt) for cost-competitive steps and expansion flexibility

This is not deglobalisation. It is footprint optimisation.

Speed Beats Perfection in the New Factory Race

Relocation used to be a multi-year, politically sensitive journey. Today, it is a 9-month race to resilience.

I. Time-to-Production as a Competitive Advantage

Firms that can relocate and stabilise faster are already outpacing those still debating. In sectors like automotive and industrial tech, every quarter lost means missed bids and frozen capacity.

We now see companies setting up partial production in Germany within 6–9 months – enabled by clear footprint design and early contractor involvement.

II. The Cost of Delay

Every month of indecision in site selection, compliance design, or layout planning has a compounding cost. Germany doesn’t lack capability. It suffers from a chronic hesitation to move.

Speed, not scale, is the modern edge.

CEOs Must Ask a Better Question: What Belongs in Germany?

The question is no longer “Should we come back?” It is “Which part of our value chain gains most from being in Germany?”

I. What to Bring Back

• Final assembly of complex products
• ESG-sensitive product lines
• Operations under regulatory or customer scrutiny
• Short-run, high-variant production with AI integration

II. What to Leave Elsewhere

• High-volume, low-margin production
• Labour-intensive tasks where cost differential is still decisive
• Supply steps that benefit from regional redundancy in CEE or MENA

What Holds Most Relocation Plans Back

Relocation failures rarely happen in the factory. They happen in the boardroom.

I. Fragmented Ownership

Too often, the question of “who leads the move” is unclear. Strategy draws the model, procurement negotiates terms, but no one is accountable for integration.

Without cross-functional execution leadership, projects stall between decision and delivery.

II. Fear of Failure > Urgency to Move

Caution is rational. Paralysis is not. Many leadership teams treat factory relocation as a once-in-a-decade gamble. But today, it must be treated like a strategic sprint.

Firms that wait for perfect clarity will watch others pass them by.

Where Interim Execution Unlocks Movement

Interim leaders do not replace strategy. They unlock it.

In factory relocation projects, временные операционные директора or site project heads step in to:

• Align planning across operations, HR, legal, and finance
• Manage real-time bottlenecks in permits, vendor onboarding, and automation rollout
• Track ROI and resilience KPIs from day one

Instead of waiting for internal alignment, interim leaders accelerate momentum – often within the first 90 days.

“Relocation doesn’t stall from lack of strategy. It stalls when no one owns the early execution.”

Именно здесь CE Interim's role becomes relevant. We bring leaders who can move fast, make trade-offs, and stabilise new factories before internal systems catch up.

Final Reflection: Relocation Is Strategy, Not Logistics

Bringing operations to Germany is no longer a defensive move. It is an opportunity to rebuild industrial control.

Done right, relocation becomes a flywheel. It integrates product design with customer feedback. It reduces exposure to distant instability. And it gives leaders the visibility to act – not react.

The question isn’t whether Germany is back in the game.

It is whether your footprint is keeping up with the speed at which the rules have changed.