Not enough time to read the full article? Listen to the summary in 2 minutes.
Saudi Arabia is expanding its industrial base at unprecedented speed. New factories are opening, digital programmes are accelerating, localisation goals are intensifying and supply chains are being rebuilt around domestic capability.
The ambition is clear, the investment is substantial and the strategic direction is consistent.
Yet one constraint repeatedly determines whether a plant stabilises, scales and sustains improvement:
the strength of its middle management.
Machines, capital and strategy set the stage.
Middle managers make them work – or reveal where they cannot.
Scale in Saudi Manufacturing Depends on More Than Capital
Executives often focus on big levers: capex, automation, throughput models and digital architecture. These matter, but they do not create stability on their own.
A factory’s performance is shaped by the layers that run production every hour of every shift – supervisors, planners, maintenance heads, quality leads and shift coordinators.
They are the operating system of a plant.
When these layers are strong, scale-up feels disciplined.
When they are weak, expansion exposes every gap.
Saudi’s industrial growth is compressing what usually takes decades into a shorter cycle. This puts extraordinary pressure on supervisory capability just as factories are expanding capacity and complexity.
The Middle Layer Is the Execution Engine
Middle managers sit at the point where strategy meets daily routine. Their work determines:
- how stable each shift performs
- how quickly issues escalate and resolve
- whether RCA is performed rigorously or superficially
- how teams receive coaching and direction
- how maintenance integrates with production
- whether KPIs guide action or simply decorate dashboards
A plant can have the best equipment and the most motivated workforce. Without strong supervisors and shift leaders, the system oscillates instead of improving.
A simple example illustrates the point:
If Shift A handles deviations immediately, logs root causes and resets the line properly, but Shift B allows shortcuts and workarounds, then widening gap between shifts is not an operator issue – it is a leadership-density issue.
Scaling such a plant magnifies inconsistency rather than eliminating it.
Why Saudi Factories Feel These Gaps More Intensely
Saudi Arabia’s industrialisation is occurring faster than capability pipelines historically grow. Countries that scaled manufacturing rapidly – Korea, China, Poland, Turkey – saw the same tension: factories expanded faster than supervisory maturity.
Saudi faces its version of that curve due to several structural factors:
1. Young supervisory pipelines
Manufacturing is still building its long-term leadership base. Many supervisors are early in their development curve.
2. Expatriate churn disrupts continuity
Turnover in expatriate middle managers causes shifts to “reset culturally,” losing tacit knowledge each cycle.
3. Localisation adds complexity, not just quotas
Meeting Saudisation targets requires new training, coaching and capability-building systems that many factories have not fully embedded.
4. Expansion amplifies every weak point
When a plant moves from one shift to two or three, supervisory gaps become exponential rather than incremental.
5. JV governance expectations require translation
Many factories operate under foreign HQ standards and local regulatory requirements. Middle managers must translate both into daily behaviour – a demanding skill set.
Together, these factors create a situation where scale-up speed is determined not by ambition, but by available leadership bandwidth.
How Weak Middle Management Shows Up on the Shop Floor
The signals are often subtle at first, then accelerate.
You may see:
- OEE volatility that changes by shift rather than by equipment
- Operators bypassing supervisors to escalate directly to senior leaders
- Digital tools installed but not used consistently
- Process deviations that reappear because corrective actions are not sustained
- Maintenance becoming reactive because daily routines are not enforced
- New Saudi hires entering the workforce without structured coaching
- Problem-solving sessions that identify symptoms but not causes
These symptoms do not indicate poor strategy or weak investment. They indicate a supervisory layer that cannot sustain the operational rhythm required for scale.
Scaling Without Leadership Depth Creates Fragile Factories
Factories with strong equipment but weak middle leadership behave like systems without stabilisers. They may run well under direct senior oversight, but performance drops quickly when attention shifts elsewhere.
As Saudi factories expand capacity, complexity and headcount, the dependency on strong middle management becomes unavoidable. Without it:
- ramp-ups take longer
- localisation becomes disruptive
- yield improvement stalls
- cost per unit rises quietly
- transformation fatigue sets in
Scale-up requires structural leadership support, not just more machinery.
What Strong Middle Management Looks Like in Saudi Context
Strength in this layer is not charisma. It is operational competence and behavioural consistency.
Factories that scale successfully tend to share four characteristics:
1. Clear shift ownership – each shift operates by the same standards, not by the personality of the shift leader.
2. Disciplined daily management – tier meetings are purposeful, and actions close before the next cycle.
3. Root-cause capability – supervisors solve problems where they occur instead of escalating everything upward.
4. Coaching mindset – new talent, including Saudi hires, is integrated through structured guidance, not informal shadowing
When these elements are present, factories scale predictably. When they are absent, the plant relies disproportionately on senior leadership – a model that cannot expand sustainably.
Building Capability While Protecting Output
Saudi’s industrial ambitions will require thousands of strong middle managers across plants, sectors and clusters. Developing this layer is a multi-year effort; factories cannot pause performance while that capability matures.
This is where additional operational leadership becomes relevant. During phases of rapid expansion, localisation transitions or OEE instability, organisations often reinforce their middle layer by bringing in experienced interim operational leaders. Their role is not to replace supervisors, but to:
- stabilise daily routines
- coach shift and line leaders
- build capability pipelines
- reset escalation discipline
- protect output while the internal bench strengthens
This ensures that scale-up continues without overburdening a supervisory base that is still developing.
Saudi’s Scale-Up Will Be Won at the Middle Layer
Saudi Arabia has the capital, the demand and the strategic alignment to become a major global manufacturing hub. But large-scale industrial systems do not succeed because of ambition alone.
They succeed because the people who run shifts, solve problems, manage handovers and maintain equipment perform at a consistently high level.
Weak middle management does not cause visible collapse; it causes slow underperformance that accumulates until scale stalls.
Strong middle management, by contrast, multiplies every investment the Kingdom is making – in automation, localisation, new plants, advanced manufacturing and digital integration.
Saudi’s industrial future will be shaped in boardrooms, but it will be won on the supervisory line.
