EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP · INTERIM PMI & CARVE-OUT DIRECTOR
An Interim Integration or Carve-Out Director with authority across both organisations.
CE Interim appoints proven Interim Integration and Carve-Out Directors to prepare for Day One or take control of stalled delivery after closing. The mandate coordinates integration or separation across the relevant organisations, within the authority and access permitted at each transaction stage.
Confidential from first contact. A vetted, mandate-matched executive ready to start within 72 hours of the completed mandate brief.
The reporting line
BOARD · INVESTOR · STEERING COMMITTEE
INTERIM INTEGRATION OR CARVE-OUT DIRECTOR
ACQUIRING ORGANISATION | ACQUIRED ORGANISATION
Finance · Operations · Systems · People · Commercial
1,500+
Mandates delivered per year across the alliance
90+
Operating partners around the world
30+
Countries covered
95%
Cross-border mandates
72 hours
From brief to mission start
Definition
What is an Interim PMI or Carve-Out Director?
An Interim Post-Merger Integration (PMI) or Carve-Out Director is an experienced executive appointed for a defined period to lead an integration or separation. The mandate covers governance, workstream sequencing, dependencies, benefits governance and Day One readiness, working across the relevant organisations within agreed decision rights and transaction stage restrictions.
On paper, integration looks straightforward: synergy targets, functional workstreams, day-one checklists. Execution can depart quickly from that script. Existing leadership stays but authority shifts. Nobody is sure who decides. Systems launch before teams are ready. Governance becomes a reporting exercise rather than a decision-making one.
Process failures and gaps in leadership can reinforce each other. The role brings accountable ownership to the decisions, dependencies and handovers that otherwise allow integration or separation value to leak.
Appointment triggers
When businesses appoint an Interim Integration or Carve-Out Director
01
The deal has closed and nobody owns what happens next
The steering committee meets. Workstream leads report. No single person has the authority to decide between two functions that disagree, so the decisions wait
02
Day One is fixed and readiness is not
Day One readiness must be proven for order-to-cash, payroll, planning and customer service. The agreed completion date drives preparation, but any change to it depends on the transaction documents, required clearances and authorised decisions.
03
A carve-out has to stand on its own
A separated business needs its own systems, its own finance function and its own operating model, while continuing to serve customers from infrastructure it does not own.
04
The transitional services clock is running
The transitional services agreement sets service dates, dependencies and commercial terms. Replacement capability and agreed exit arrangements must be ready for each relevant deadline. Extensions are not assumed; availability, notice and pricing depend on the agreement.
05
The synergy case has not become a plan
Targets exist and nobody owns them. There is no pipeline, no named accountability and no way to tell whether a saving has been realised or merely forecast
06
Systems were integrated before the operation was stable
A platform or reporting change has been pushed through while production, service or finance were still recovering from the transaction, and both are now at risk.
07
Two cultures are producing polite paralysis
Meetings are constructive, decisions are not implemented, and both organisations are protecting their way of working. Governance has become a reporting exercise rather than a decision-making one.
08
Separation and integration are running at once
A business is being carved out of one group and into another simultaneously, with both programmes competing for the same functional capacity and the same people.
Is this the right seat?
Does the situation require an Interim Integration Director?
The determining question is whether integration or separation needs coordinated executive ownership across organisations, or whether a defined functional gap can be resolved by the appropriate functional leader.
Appoint an Interim Integration or Carve-Out Director when:
- Decisions are stalling because no one person can make them across both sides.
- Day One is fixed and readiness has to be driven rather than tracked.
- A transitional services agreement sets a schedule the business is behind.
- The synergy case needs converting into owned, measurable actions.
- Separation and integration have to be sequenced against each other.
Decision rule
When the transaction timetable is set and the execution risk is ownership rather than analysis, this is the appropriate appointment.
When a different role is the right one
Where financial consolidation, reporting or treasury is the principal gap, an Interim CFO leads that workstream. The integration director coordinates it with the wider programme where dependencies extend beyond finance.
Where sustained operating leadership across functions or sites is required, an Interim COO leads the operating mandate. An integration director can still coordinate transaction milestones and dependencies across the wider programme.
Where the acquired or separating business lacks accountable enterprise leadership, appoint an Interim CEO. Integration or separation is coordinated with that executive rather than treated as a substitute for leading the business.
Where workforce consultation, organisation design or employee transfer is the principal gap, an Interim HR Director leads the people workstream, coordinated with the transaction programme.
If what you need is the integration approach rather than the executive to run it, our post-merger integration and carve-out service page sets out how CE Interim structures these programmes.
CE Interim defines the mandate first and recommends the role second.
Role comparison
Which role does the business need?
Scroll the table sideways →
| Interim Integration Director | Interim CEO | Interim CFO | M&A advisory | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scope | The integration or separation programme | The acquired business | The finance integration | The plan |
| Authority sits | Delegated across the programme | Within the business mandate | Within the finance mandate | Client retains decisions |
| Owns | Sequencing, dependencies, benefits governance, Day One | The business result | Ledger, reporting, synergy evidence | The recommendation |
| Appointed when | Nobody owns execution | The business lacks a leader | Finance integration needs executive ownership | Advice is needed before or after close |
| Ends when | The operating model is stable and handed over | Agreed business objectives and handover are complete | Finance objectives and handover are complete | Agreed advisory deliverables are complete |
| Time to start | Ready to start within 72 hours of the completed mandate brief | Ready to start within 72 hours of the completed mandate brief | Ready to start within 72 hours of the completed mandate brief | Depends on scope and engagement |
Interim Integration Director
Interim CEO
Interim CFO
M&A advisory
Failure modes
How these appointments fail
The integration is sequenced by organisation chart instead of by deadline.
Workstreams are ordered by function because that is how the business is structured. In a carve-out the actual schedule is set by the transitional services agreement: every service the seller provides has an exit date, and extension can increase cost or create additional exposure depending on the agreement. Sequencing against exits rather than the organisation chart helps prevent avoidable service extensions and prolonged dependency on the seller.
Systems are integrated before the operation can absorb it.
Integrating systems before the operation is ready can disrupt the activity the synergy case depends on. The sequencing decision should therefore be based on operational readiness rather than on a fixed assumption that earlier is better. This ordering decision is consequential in an industrial integration and it belongs to one accountable person.
A steering committee is treated as an owner.
Committee oversight does not replace day-to-day programme ownership. When delegated decisions and reserved matters have no named owners or response route, workstreams repeat the same escalations and unresolved dependencies delay execution.
Separation and integration lack shared dependency control.
Separation and integration may retain distinct teams, contracts and governance. They still need an agreed view of interdependencies, capacity and decision routes, with information sharing limited to what is lawful and authorised. Without that coordination, the programmes can compete for the same people and miss linked milestones.
Scope of authority
What an Interim Integration Director mandate should include
A named sponsor and decision space, agreed before the start.
Name the sponsor, delegated decisions, reserved matters and escalation route before the start. The executive can resolve programme issues within those limits; sponsor, board and counterparty decisions remain with the authorised parties.
Sequencing authority.
Authority to sequence workstreams and defer non-essential changes within agreed limits. Legal, contractual and mandatory reporting deadlines remain binding unless varied through the applicable approval process. Business and technical owners provide readiness evidence before changes are authorised.
Authority across both organisations.
Programme direction is agreed with authorised sponsors on the relevant sides. It does not create unilateral control over a seller, service provider or pre-close target. Counterparty commitments follow the transaction documents, service agreements and agreed governance.
Ownership of the dependency view.
A coordinated dependency map, issue queue and decision cadence across the programme. Where separation and integration run together, their interfaces are managed explicitly while each party retains its legal responsibilities, contractual approvals and information-access restrictions.
Benefits accountability.
Ownership of the synergy pipeline, with named owners, validated actions and a measurement that distinguishes realised from forecast.
Day One scope authority.
Authority to prioritise processes required for safe, lawful continuity on Day One, agree acceptance criteria with functional owners and protect their resources. Deferring other work must not remove mandatory obligations or bypass sponsor and contract approvals.
Authority note
The mandate must match the decisions and deadlines it is intended to manage. Delegated programme decisions, reserved sponsor decisions and counterparty approvals need clear owners, escalation routes and response times from the start.
Statutory responsibility, scope and cover
Statutory responsibility.
Where the mandate requires it, the executive may receive defined signature authority within the programme’s scope, delegated statutory duties or, where formally appointed and permitted by the local corporate structure, a statutory position. The scope is agreed before the start rather than assumed. In a carve-out, a separated entity may also require an accountable officer before permanent leadership is in place.
Scope is agreed before the executive starts.
The client, CE Interim and the executive define duties, boundaries and signature limits in writing.
Insurance is arranged per mandate.
Executives carry their own professional liability and directors’ and officers’ cover. On some mandates the client provides or contributes to it. CE Interim and every member of the Valtus Alliance carries its own cover as well.
Mandate arc
How an integration or carve-out mandate unfolds
The sequence follows Day One, operational readiness and any transitional-service exits. For appointments after closing, begin with the current position and outstanding dependencies rather than restart a phase that has already passed.
01
Before Day One
Scope what must work
Confirm the transaction stage, legal constraints and critical Day One processes. Build the dependency and service-exit plan, assign owners and test readiness where permitted. Start authorised preparations and replacement-capability work early enough to meet the timetable, without premature control or prohibited information exchange.
02
Day One to the first exits
Stabilise and execute the exit plan
Maintain operating continuity and execute the prepared transition plan. Continue building, testing and transferring replacement capabilities in time for approved exits. Validate the synergy pipeline with business owners and finance. Escalate exceptions promptly and manage any extension through the agreement, not as an assumed option.
03
Through the exits to steady state
Complete transitions and hand over
Complete integration or separation against tested operational readiness and agreed acceptance criteria. Confirm service exits, transfer remaining risks and responsibilities to named owners, and retain only the programme governance needed for outstanding work.
INTEGRATION MANDATE · 9 TO 18 MONTHS
In CE Interim’s experience, the opening weeks are used to establish one decision cadence, one dependency view and one escalation route. Total duration depends on the transaction structure, operational readiness, the transitional-services schedule and the scale of the integration.
CARVE-OUT MANDATE · AGREED EXITS AND HANDOVER
Where a business is standing alone, the horizon is set by the transitional services agreement rather than by readiness.
Talk to a Partner about the mandate before the situation defines it for you.
Outcomes and handover
What effective integration leadership should achieve
Day One holds
The processes that had to work on day one worked, and run-the-business performance did not degrade while the programme ran.
One decision route
Shared dependencies have named decision owners and agreed escalation routes, with each party’s reserved approvals respected.
Exits made, not allowed to drift
Transitional services are replaced against the agreed schedule rather than extended by default.
Benefits owned
The synergy case has become a pipeline with names against it and a measurement that distinguishes realised from forecast.
An operating model, not a project
The combined or separated business runs on a structure it can sustain rather than on a programme office.
Handover
Clean documentation, team alignment and a stable operating model, transferred to named people inside the business. You choose whether that is a permanent handover or continued interim support.
Who we send
The Interim Integration and Carve-Out Directors we appoint
Has run an integration to a fixed Day One.
Not advised on one. Has carried accountability for a date that could not move, with customer-facing processes that could not be allowed to degrade as it approached.
Has managed a transitional services exit.
Knows that the agreement creates critical dates, dependencies and commercial constraints, and has stood up replacement capability against those exit dates. Has also handled extension or renewal decisions where the agreement created additional cost or exposure.
Has held authority across two organisations at once.
Has directed workstream leads across organisations, including where functional reporting lines stayed unchanged, and resolved interdependencies through agreed decision rights and sponsor escalation. Experience on both sides matters because critical integration decisions often sit between organisations rather than wholly inside either one.
Has said no to a go-live.
Has delayed an integration milestone where operational readiness did not support it, and defended the sequencing decision to a steering committee. Sequencing judgement is central to this seat.
Has carried a synergy number, not reported on one.
Has owned a benefits case with names against each line and a measurement that distinguished realised from forecast, in front of an investor who was checking.
CE Interim works through more than 90 operating partners across the Valtus Alliance, in over 30 countries. Where a workstream requires additional specialist leadership, CE Interim can draw from the wider Valtus Alliance network.
The appointment model
From confidential briefing to appointment
01
Situation briefing
A Partner conversation under NDA. Where the transaction stands, what has stalled, what Day One requires, and what authority can be delegated across both organisations.
02
Mandate definition and challenge-specific assessment
CE Interim defines the scope, the sponsor, the decision space and the first objectives, then interviews each executive for this transaction and this stage rather than against a generic integration profile.
03
Presentation, appointment and governance
You receive a small number of genuinely relevant executives, not a CV list. Weekly Partner check-ins and milestone tracking follow, and additional specialists can be deployed midstream where a workstream needs one.
Cross-border strain
Why cross-border integrations are harder to govern
What the acquirer needs
- Its standards, systems and reporting cadence actually adopted
- To be told a milestone is unachievable before it is missed
- One view of progress across both organisations
What the acquired business needs
- Someone who understands which group standards are workable locally
- Decisions taken close enough to the operation to be right
- Not to be integrated faster than it can keep serving customers
The plan is written where the acquirer sits and executed where the business operates. Local constraints may not be visible in the central programme until they affect execution, so the integration leader needs enough credibility on both sides to surface them early and to be told the truth by each.
Corridors we work in most often
Situation modules
Typical integration and carve-out mandates
Post-Merger Integration
The transaction has closed and execution has stalled between two organisations that do not yet know who decides. The mandate is to establish ownership, sequence the work and hold run-the-business performance while it happens.
Carve-Out and Separation
A business must stand alone against a deadline set by the transaction, while still running on infrastructure it does not own. The mandate is sequenced against transitional service exit dates.
Enterprise-Critical Transformation Programmes
A systems or reporting integration has been pushed ahead of operational readiness. The mandate is to re-sequence it against what the operation can absorb.
Governance, Visibility and Control
The synergy case exists and nobody owns it. The mandate is to convert targets into a pipeline with names, actions and a measurement that survives scrutiny.
Sector environments
Where CE Interim appoints integration and carve-out leadership
Primary sectors
ALSO SERVED
Transaction environments
Ownership environments
Sector understanding matters. The defining selection criterion is comparable responsibility at a comparable stage of a comparable transaction.
Case evidence
Integration mandates in practice
Global materials group · Present in more than thirty countries · Intervention in Czechia · Integration into an existing East European cluster
Acquired Czech entity brought into a European cluster
Situation
A recently acquired Czech business had to be brought into the group’s existing regional structure.
Mandate
Financial consolidation, monthly reporting, governance and treasury, alongside the cross-cultural work that determines whether an integration is adopted or merely announced. Scoped at twelve to twenty-four months.
Outcome
The acquired business was integrated into the European cluster under a common reporting, governance and treasury framework. Local management moved from standalone practices to group-aligned routines, giving headquarters clearer visibility and the Czech operation a more stable basis for operating inside the wider organisation.
Cross-border industrial group · Intervention in Germany · Industrial manufacturing · Post-merger integration
Reporting cadence rebuilt after a German acquisition, 90 days
Situation
Two organisations had merged without their reporting following.
Mandate
CE Interim appointed an Interim CFO to establish a unified reporting cadence and bring synergy execution back on track.
Outcome
A unified reporting cadence was established within ninety days. Reporting delays fell by more than half, with early cost savings during the mandate. The function later transitioned to steady-state operations under the new holding company.
Role note
This was a finance-led integration mandate. The same assignment is presented from the finance perspective on the Interim CFO page.
Speak with the Partner who would lead your mandate.
Cost and duration
What an integration or carve-out mandate costs and how long it runs
Mandates are priced as a daily rate against scope, authority and duration. There is no percentage of salary, no placement fee and no upfront investment. You pay for days worked against an agreed mandate, and the rate is confirmed before the executive starts.
Indicative daily rate
€1,000 – €3,000
Higher where the mandate carries a statutory position or cross-border complexity.
Duration and milestones
Integration mandate
Nine to eighteen months
EARLY MANDATE FOCUS
Decision cadence, dependencies and escalation
EXECUTIVE READY TO START
Within 72 hours of the completed mandate brief
What moves the number.
The number of countries and legal entities in scope. The duration of the transitional services agreement and how many schedules have to be exited. Whether separation and integration run in parallel. Whether systems integration sits inside the mandate. Every mandate is delivered on site.
What it should be measured against.
Not the cost of the mandate, but the cost of the situation continuing without an accountable executive while decisions are deferred.
What you will actually pay.
A Partner gives you a figure in the first confidential conversation. No charge, no obligation.
Questions
Questions boards and investors ask
Is this the same as your post-merger integration service?
They work together. The service page sets out how CE Interim structures integration and carve-out programmes. This page is about the executive who owns the execution: the authority they need, and how the appointment is made.
Interim Integration Director or Interim CEO?
An Integration Director leads transaction execution and dependencies across the programme. An Interim CEO leads the acquired or separating business where enterprise leadership is missing. The roles can operate together: programme coordination does not replace responsibility for running the business.
Interim Integration Director or a consultancy?
A consultancy typically provides analysis, programme design and recommendations. An Interim Integration Director carries delegated executive authority to make sequencing, dependency and Day One decisions within the mandate, and remains accountable for execution across the relevant organisations.
Can the executive direct people who do not report to them?
Yes, where lawful programme authority and cooperation arrangements are agreed with the relevant sponsors. Workstream leads can retain functional reporting lines. The appointment does not automatically give control over a pre-close target, seller or external service provider; commitments and reserved decisions follow the applicable governance and agreements.
Why does the transitional services agreement matter so much?
A transitional services agreement (TSA) defines temporary services, deadlines, dependencies and commercial terms. Those schedules must become an exit plan with tested replacement capability or another agreed destination. Extensions, early termination, notice and charges depend on the agreement. The TSA is a key constraint, not the entire programme plan.
When should systems be integrated?
When business and technical readiness support the change and necessary approvals are in place. The CIO or technical lead owns the technology workstream; the integration director coordinates dependencies, capacity and transaction milestones with business owners. Early integration is not automatically better, and a carve-out may require separation rather than combination.
Can you add a specialist midstream?
Yes. Where a workstream needs dedicated leadership, a systems transition lead or an HR integration director can be added alongside the integration director from the wider network.
Who contracts the executive, and what does the client carry?
CE Interim structures mandates on a business-to-business basis, and the interim executive does not join the client as a permanent employee. The contracting party is a local entity or a regional hub depending on the country of intervention, drawn from more than thirty entities across the Valtus Alliance. Employment-status, tax, social-security and related obligations depend on the jurisdiction, the contracting structure and the circumstances of the mandate, so the engagement is structured for the country in which the work is performed.
Who carries the risk where the executive holds a formal position?
The executive carries their own professional liability and directors’ and officers’ cover; on some mandates the client provides or contributes to it. CE Interim and each Valtus Alliance member carry their own cover. Duties, boundaries and signature limits are agreed in writing. Insurance is subject to policy terms and does not remove legal responsibilities.
When should we appoint, before or after close?
Where legally permitted and the timetable allows, appointing before close can improve Day One preparation. Pre-close work must respect merger-control, competition-law, confidentiality and transaction restrictions, so access and decision rights over the target remain appropriately limited. After lawful completion and required clearance, the mandate can move into authorised execution. A post-close appointment starts with the current position and unresolved dependencies.
Who owns the synergy number, us or the executive?
The executive owns the pipeline and the measurement. The business owns delivery of each line, with a named owner against it. Keeping those responsibilities separate helps prevent the programme from becoming the only place where accountability sits.
How long before the programme is under control?
The opening weeks are used to establish one dependency view, one issue queue and one escalation route. The mandate itself runs longer, with duration driven by the integration scope and any transitional-services exit schedule.
What happens at the end?
Clean documentation, team alignment and a stable operating model, handed to named people inside the business. You choose whether that is a permanent handover or continued interim support.
Integration value does not disappear at once. It leaks while everyone waits for a decision.
Speak directly with a CE Interim Partner about the transaction, the mandate and the authority required. Confidential, and it does not commit you to an appointment.
Partner response within 24 hours.
EN 
DE 
FR 
IT 
PL 
RO 
CS 
SK 
HU 
ES 
RU 
AR 
SL