VSTAVITE SVOJ ŽIVLJENJEPIS
STOPITE V STIK Z NAMI

Preko meja: Izkoriščanje strategije Kitajska plus ena za zmanjšanje stroškov in ohranjanje dobičkonosnosti v EU: Izkoriščanje strategije Kitajska plus ena za zmanjšanje stroškov in ohranjanje dobičkonosnosti v EU

Not enough time to read the full article? Listen to the summary in 2 minutes. China has been the world’s go-to manufacturing hub due to extensive benefits. However, the recent global events have exposed the vulnerabilities of relying on the country as your manufacturing base. You must have a backup plan in case things go downhill.  Logistics costs are rising, trade wars are happening, political instability is persistent, and consumers are growing skeptical. This has driven businesses to diversify production networks– leading to the rise of the “China Plus One Strategy.” It’s a smart approach that allows companies to retain their Chinese manufacturing facility while combining its benefits with production at strategic locations like Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) or the Balkans. This significantly minimizes risks and improves resilience while maintaining profitability and competitiveness. Let’s dive deep into this tactical approach to figure out if it’s the right strategy for you. The Benefits & Limitations of China as a Manufacturing Hub To begin with, you must understand the benefits and challenges of having a manufacturing hub only in China: Key Benefits: Massive production capacity: China still offers incredible scalability. If your company aims at high-volume production, then it’s a highly beneficial location. Low labor costs: While China’s labor costs have risen significantly—by up to 70% in the last decade, according to McKinsey—they remain competitive for many industries. Infrastructure and supply chain efficiency: China’s well-developed infrastructure supports its robust supply chains, making it difficult for other regions to replicate its logistics efficiency. Challenges: Rising logistics costs: Shipping costs from China to Europe have surged by over 300% in recent years as reported by Bloomberg. The reasons are rising fuel prices, global supply chain bottlenecks, and container shortages. This has put a severe strain on profitability. Embargos and trade wars: The ongoing U.S.-China trade war and other geopolitical tensions have caused businesses to reassess their overreliance on China, leading to increased tariffs, disrupted supply chains, and uncertainty. Political instability: With policies like embargos and trade restrictions frequently shifting, companies depending solely on Chinese manufacturing face significant risks in maintaining stable supply chains. Why Has China Plus One Strategy Become the Need of the Hour? Diversifying beyond China isn’t just an option anymore, it’s a necessity due to dreadful risks. The China Plus One strategy prevents you from relying too much on a single production location and offers protection against global uncertainties.  Here are the 3 key reasons why it’s the right approach: Mitigating risks: Companies employing the China Plus One Strategy reduce their exposure to trade wars, tariffs, and other economic and geopolitical risks. Just-in-time logistics: Manufacturing closer to Europe enables companies to adhere to just-in-time principles more effectively. Goods shipped from China take 30 to 45 days for shipping while intra-European shipments arrive in just 1 to 3 days. Note this difference. Freight costs: Rising fuel prices and transportation bottlenecks are making long-haul shipping from China prohibitively expensive. So, get production near your home and cut costs on freight. Why Choose Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) or the Balkans for the Plus One Strategy? Central and Eastern Europe and the Balkans have become emerging destinations for companies to move their production base or invest in a new manufacturing facility. Countries like Romania,  Hungary, Poland, and others have tactical benefits like market proximity, plenty of skilled talent, cost-saving opportunities, great regulatory alignment, and more. Geographical Proximity and Reduced Shipping Costs CEE countries are proximal to key European markets and The shorter distance also makes delivery times faster, lead times shorter, and market response times quicker. Companies can slash the shipping costs by half compared to transporting things from China. Lower Labor Costs Compared to Western Europe According to the OECD, labor costs in CEE and Balkan countries are 40 to 60% lower than in Western Europe despite having an equally skilled workforce. This helps companies save money without fighting the logistical and geopolitical challenges of Asian countries. Infrastructure and Logistics Network Countries like Poland and the Czech Republic have made significant investments in infrastructure over the last decade. This makes them a brilliant destination for manufacturing operations.  The World Bank had ranked Poland among the top 25 nations globally for logistics performance. Political Stability Many CEE and Balkan nations are members of the European Union. This ensures regulatory alignment with EU standards, which reduces legal and compliance risks. Political stability in these countries contrasts with the more unpredictable environments found in certain other low-cost manufacturing destinations like Southeast Asia. Comparing CEE/Balkans with Other Low-Cost Manufacturing Destinations Now let’s compare strategic locations like CEE and the Balkans with traditional manufacturing hubs like Asia (Vietnam, Bangladesh, etc.), Latin America, and Africa. Asian countries are inexpensive labor but there are crucial skill issues and shipping times are too high. Meanwhile, Latin America may be an ideal solution for the U.S.-based companies but it still presents logistical challenges and regulatory issues for European firms.  Finally, Africa is an emerging market for companies but the underdeveloped infrastructure, political instability, and lack of skilled labor shoo away manufacturing companies. Key Advantages of the China Plus CEE/Balkans Strategy for European Businesses With the China Plus CEE/Balkans manufacturing strategy, companies can unlock access to an extensive list of benefits: Reduced Dependency on China: When you diversify out of China, it spreads the concentrated risks and your business won’t be halted due to issues in one region. Cost-Efficient Logistics: When you manufacture in the CEE or Balkans, the transportation costs are 30-40% lower than those in China. This also boosts profits while reducing delivery times. Resilience and Flexibility: By diversifying production between China and Europe, companies can easily shift operations based on market demand or geopolitical developments, offering greater operational flexibility. Regulatory Alignment with EU Standards: Manufacturing in CEE ensures full compliance with EU environmental, labor, and safety regulations, reducing the risk of fines, legal disputes, and compliance violations. How to Implement an Effective China Plus One Plan? Implementing an effective China Plus One plan isn’t a cakewalk. You must

Strateška diverzifikacija proti deindustrializaciji: Selitev v srednjo in vzhodno Evropo ali zunanje izvajanje?

Not enough time to read the full article? Listen to the summary in 2 minutes. Germany is undergoing a wave of deindustrialization which is far too strong to subdue anytime soon. Automotive manufacturers, which have been the driving force behind the country’s economy, are struggling with challenges that need immediate strategic action. Among many counter-effective plans, manufacturing footprint diversification to automotive superpowers in the CEE region has emerged as a powerful alternative to outsourcing. For automotive manufacturers and other industries deeply impacted by rising operational costs and energy prices, the decision of whether to outsource or relocate their factories within Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) is confusing, complicated, but very critical. We will take a look at the pros and cons of both approaches and compare them specifically for automotive manufacturers and other high-stakes industries here. By the end of it, you’ll realize why moving production to CEE countries may be a better alternative. The Automotive Industry’s Battle Against Deindustrialization For years, Germany’s automotive industry has been the driving factor behind its industrial legacy. However, the recent deindustrialization in the country due to factors like increasing energy prices, growing labor shortages, and geopolitical uncertainties have brought doomsday to the industry. The soaring energy costs have worsened things as the automotive industry relies heavily on uninterrupted production lines and access to energy. Manufacturers are desperately looking for ways to adapt and strategically diversify their operations to preserve competitiveness and sustain profitability– with outsourcing and factory relocation appearing as the top two solutions. Why Outsourcing Falls Short in the Deindustrialization Battle? Outsourcing may be a widely used strategy globally but it has its own set of risks that harm your company’s long-term future. Especially in industries like automotive manufacturing that rely on robust quality control measures, proprietary technologies, and complex supply chains. Let’s take a look at some key reasons to understand why outsourcing isn’t the most vital tool for fighting deindustrialization as a German automotive manufacturer: 1. Loss of Control and Oversight  When manufacturing is outsourced, businesses lose their direct control over the production process. Outsourcing partners may not adhere to the same standards of quality or innovation, leading to a decline in the final product.  For companies rooted in precision manufacturing—such as those in Germany’s automotive sector—this loss of control is a serious threat to their brand reputation. 2. Persistent Communication Barriers Communicating becomes harder when you outsource productions to distant regions. Your vendors will use different languages, come from varying cultures, and work in their preferred time zones. Your company’s operational efficiency will suffer in this case. 3. Intellectual Property Risks If you outsource productions to a region with poorly defined or weak IP laws, your intellectual property is at risk of theft. If your cutting-edge designs, techniques, and innovations get stolen, your company will be doomed and chaos will be unimaginable. 4. Dependency on External Partners You are at the mercy of your outsourcing partners when you hand over your productions to them. If they fail to meet production targets or deliver inconsistent quality, you are doomed. Your supply chain will be affected and operation downtimes are imminent. Due to these challenges, outsourcing is not the right thing to do if you are trying to defend against deindustrialization attacks. Factory Relocation to CEE Can Be Your Trump Card In contrast, manufacturing footprint diversification to automotive superpowers in the CEE region offers a more controlled, reliable alternative to outsourcing. The countries in Central and Eastern Europe have become the ideal manufacturing relocations lately due to great proximity, competitive labor markets, and significant investments in infrastructure. Let’s explore the key advantages of relocating to CEE countries like Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, and the Czech Republic. 1. Proximity to Germany: Greater Control and Easier Logistics Factory relocation to the CEE countries provides geographical advantages that are absent with outsourcing destinations in Asia or South America. These countries are so close to Germany that managing operations becomes smoother and you won’t face any supply chain issues. This proximity enables companies to retain much-required control over their operations while significantly reducing transport costs and lead times. For instance, Slovakia is rising up the ranks as the next automotive manufacturing leader in Europe. The country offers advanced infrastructure and facilities, and an amazing workforce that is highly skilled but works at fairly low wages. 2. Labor and Cost Advantages Without Sacrificing Quality The CEE countries have advanced educational and vocational training programs. The talent produced here is not only capable but highly adaptable to advanced manufacturing technologies. Additionally, they demand wages that are significantly lower than in Germany. For German manufacturers, it’s nothing less than a blessing as they can reduce operational costs without sacrificing the quality of their products. 3. Strong Regulatory Alignment with EU Standards CEE countries operate under EU regulations, so you don’t have to worry about compliance problems as the transition will be seamless. However, when you outsource production, you are at the risk of regulatory misalignment with compliance, environmental, and labor laws. Most importantly, German automotive companies can maintain strict adherence to EU environmental policies by relocating to CEE countries. It’s crucial as they are already facing immense scrutiny over emissions standards. So, there is assurance that relocated factories will follow the necessary legal and ethical guidelines to prevent costly regulatory fines and reputational damage. 4. Robust Infrastructure and Supply Chain Resilience CEE countries have invested heavily in upgrading their infrastructure to accommodate the influx of foreign manufacturers. Whether it’s road and rail networks, telecommunications, or energy supplies, these nations have developed the infrastructure required to support complex manufacturing operations. For automotive manufacturers, where efficiency in supply chains is vital, the well-established logistics networks in CEE countries allow for seamless integration into global supply chains, ensuring production continuity and resilience even during periods of global disruption. 5. A Long-Term Solution Amid Rising Costs Outsourcing often appears as the quick fix to reduce operational costs but you may end up neglecting the long-lasting downsides impacting your company’s future. On the

Blažitev deindustrializacije: Premestitev v Srednjo in Vzhodno Evropo proti zunanjemu izvajanju za vrednost za delničarje.

Nimate dovolj časa, da bi prebrali celoten članek? Poslušajte povzetek v 2 minutah. Nad nemško industrijsko pokrajino se zgrinjajo temni oblaki deindustrializacije, ki so nastali zaradi naraščajočih stroškov poslovanja, energetske krize in regulativnih pritiskov. Ti ogrožajo dobičkonosnost in vrednost za delničarje, medtem ko se podjetja borijo za sonce rasti. Če ste lastnik podjetja v Nemčiji, so lahko alternativne strategije, kot sta zunanje izvajanje in selitev tovarn v Srednjo in Vzhodno Evropo (SVE), vaše prepotrebno zavetje. Ponujajo možnosti za zmanjšanje stroškov, varujejo operativno učinkovitost in ohranjajo globalno konkurenčnost. Vendar je težko izbrati eno od njih. V tem poglobljenem vodniku bomo primerjali obe strategiji, da bi razumeli, katera bolje zmanjšuje tveganja deindustrializacije in varuje vrednost za delničarje. Potopimo se! Katera so ključna tveganja deindustrializacije? Deindustrializacija se nanaša na pojav, ko se industrijska dejavnost in zaposlovanje v državi zmanjšujeta ali ukinjata, zlasti v predelovalni in težki industriji. Nemčija je bila glavna žrtev tega strašnega trenda zaradi kombinacije različnih dejavnikov. V Nemčiji deindustrializacijo zaznamuje več tveganj, ki škodujejo industrijskim podjetjem: naraščajoči stroški energije: Energetsko intenzivni sektorji, kot je proizvodnja, se soočajo z nevzdržnimi cenami električne energije in plina. Po podatkih Eurostata so bili leta 2023 nemški industrijski stroški energije med najvišjimi v Evropi, saj so se v zadnjih dveh letih povečali za 45%. Operativna neučinkovitost: Strogi predpisi skupaj z motnjami v dobavni verigi in pomanjkanjem delovne sile ter upadanjem delovne morale prispevajo k zmanjšanju operativne učinkovitosti in konkurenčnosti. Zmanjševanje produktivnosti: Nemška podjetja so že dolgo znana po svojih visokih standardih produktivnosti. Vendar pa jo je nedavna sprememba okolja močno ovirala. Če se vaše podjetje sooča s podobnimi težavami, morate pravočasno sprejeti taktične ukrepe. Vpliv tveganj deindustrializacije na vrednost za delničarje: Tveganja, povezana z naraščajočo deindustrializacijo, zmanjšujejo vrednost za delničarje, zaradi česar trpijo nemška podjetja. Naraščajoči stroški uničujejo marže, zaradi česar je zelo težko vzdrževati dobičkonosnost. Zaradi tega je zaupanje vlagateljev okrnjeno, podjetja pa se otepajo kapitala in iščejo nove naložbene priložnosti. Če se razmere ne bodo hitro reševale, lahko povzročijo dolgoročno škodo in nakazujejo verjeten konec podjetij. Tudi največji akterji so zaskrbljeni. Primerjava zunanjega izvajanja in selitve tovarn v Srednjo in Vzhodno Evropo za zmanjšanje tveganj deindustrializacije Podjetja morajo izvajati hitre strategije za zmanjšanje tveganj, povezanih z deindustrializacijo. Selitev tovarne v Srednjo in Vzhodno Evropo in zunanje izvajanje sta se izkazali za dve optimalni rešitvi. Vendar morate izbrati najbolj idealen pristop za svoje podjetje. Pomagali vam bomo pri odločitvi, kateri načrt je za vas boljši: Zunanje izvajanje nadzora kakovosti in optimizacije procesov: Čeprav se zunanje izvajanje na oddaljenih lokacijah, kot sta Azija ali Južna Amerika, morda zdi stroškovno učinkovito, pogosto povzroči zmanjšan nadzor nad kakovostjo. Glede na poročilo družbe KPMG se 41% podjetij sooča s težavami s kakovostjo pri dejavnostih, oddanih v zunanje izvajanje. Selitev v Srednjo in Vzhodno Evropo: Po drugi strani pa selitev tovarne v države srednje in vzhodne Evrope podjetjem omogoča, da ohranijo večji nadzor nad proizvodnjo. Velika bližina te regije Nemčiji in ustrezna uskladitev s standardi kakovosti EU zagotavljata zanesljivo zagotavljanje kakovosti. Podjetja na Poljskem in Madžarskem imajo na primer koristi od visokokvalificirane delovne sile s strokovnim znanjem na področju proizvodnje, kar zagotavlja ohranjanje kakovosti ob konkurenčnih stroških. Zmagovalec: Selitev v Srednjo in Vzhodno Evropo omogoča boljšo optimizacijo procesov in nadzor kakovosti. Varnost podatkov in zunanje izvajanje intelektualne lastnine: V številnih nizkocenovnih destinacijah za zunanje izvajanje je pravna zaščita intelektualne lastnine (IP) in varnosti podatkov šibkejša, zato so nemška podjetja izpostavljena kraji IP. McKinseyjeva študija je pokazala, da se 22% podjetij, ki se odločajo za zunanje izvajanje v regijah zunaj EU, sooča s precejšnjimi pomisleki glede varnosti podatkov, kar ni presenetljivo. Selitev v Srednjo in Vzhodno Evropo: S selitvijo v države srednje in vzhodne Evrope znotraj EU imajo podjetja koristi od strogih predpisov o varstvu podatkov v skladu z uredbo GDPR, saj okvir varuje intelektualno lastnino in lastniške podatke - zmanjšuje tveganja in prinaša koristi. Zmagovalec: Zaradi močne varnosti intelektualne lastnine in zakonov o varstvu podatkov je zmagovalec: selitev v Srednjo in Vzhodno Evropo. Zunanje izvajanje komunikacij in koordinacije: Upravljanje dejavnosti z oddaljenih lokacij je težavno. Komunikacijske vrzeli še povečajo vaše težave. Tem se ni mogoče izogniti, saj imajo regije zunanjega izvajanja različne jezike, kulture in časovne pasove. Glede na poročilo družbe PwC se 30% podjetij srečuje z zamudami in nesporazumi, ko oddajajo dejavnosti v zunanje izvajanje v oddaljene regije, kot so Kitajska, Indija in Filipini. To povzroča neučinkovitost, zaradi česar so delničarji nezadovoljni. Selitev v Srednjo in Vzhodno Evropo: Selitev tovarn v države srednje in vzhodne Evrope zmanjšuje te težave. Te države so Nemčiji kulturno in geografsko blizu. To zagotavlja bolj gladko komunikacijo in usklajevanje. Jezikovne ovire so prav tako zmanjšane, razlike v časovnih pasovih pa zanemarljive, kar omogoča učinkovitejše sodelovanje. Zmagovalec: Zaradi kulturne usklajenosti in bližine. Bližina trga in zunanje izvajanje logistike: Logistični izzivi so pogosti pri oddaljenih središčih zunanjega izvajanja, kot je Azija. Naveličali se boste dolgih prevoznih rokov, višjih stroškov prevoza in zapletenih carinskih postopkov. Zaradi tega nemška podjetja težje pravočasno izpolnijo zahteve evropskih strank. Selitev v Srednjo in Vzhodno Evropo: Države srednje in vzhodne Evrope se nemoteno vključujejo v evropsko dobavno verigo. Eurostatovo poročilo je tudi poudarilo, da so stroški prevoza iz držav SVE 30-40% nižji od stroškov prevoza iz Azije. Ko so dobavni roki krajši, se lahko vaše podjetje hitro odzove na zahteve trga. Zmagovalec: zaradi bližine in nižjih logističnih stroškov. Stroškovna učinkovitost in priložnosti za inovacije Zunanje izvajanje: Zunanje izvajanje dejavnosti pri prodajalcih v Aziji ali Južni Ameriki zagotavlja kratkoročne priložnosti za prihranek stroškov. Vendar pa tveganja, kot so slaba kakovost izdelkov, zamude pri dobavi in ranljivost intelektualne lastnine, močno odtehtajo. Zato v prihodnosti ni možnosti za rast. Selitev v Srednjo in Vzhodno Evropo: Stroški dela v državah srednje in vzhodne Evrope so sicer 40-60% nižji kot v Nemčiji (Svetovni gospodarski forum), vendar se te države ponašajo tudi s tehnično usposobljeno delovno silo. To podjetjem omogoča, da spodbujajo inovacije, ne da bi pri tem žrtvovala stroškovno učinkovitost. Ker lahko dostopate do visokokvalificiranega nabora talentov po nominalnih plačah, je to dolgoročna rešitev za rast vrednosti za delničarje. Zmagovalec: Preselitev v Srednjo in Vzhodno Evropo zagotavlja prihranke pri stroških in dolgoročne možnosti za inovacije. Oddajanje infrastrukture in delovne sile v zunanje izvajanje: Destinacije zunanjega izvajanja, kot je jugovzhodna Azija, lahko ponujajo konkurenčne plače, vendar je infrastruktura v primerjavi z Evropo pogosto slabo razvita. Če je prometno omrežje slabo, se ni mogoče izogniti operativnim zamudam in neučinkovitosti. Selitev v Srednjo in Vzhodno Evropo: Države, kot so Poljska, Madžarska in Češka, so veliko vlagale v industrijsko infrastrukturo. Po podatkih Svetovne banke se Poljska uvršča med 25 najboljših držav na svetu po

Navigacija v deindustrializaciji: Premestitev tovarne v Srednji in Vzhodni Evropi vs. zunanje izvajanje in izguba nadzora

Not enough time to read the full article? Listen to the summary in 2 minutes. Amid chaotic deindustrialization in Germany, industries are facing threats like rising operational costs, energy shortages, and fierce global competition. Businesses are looking for alternative strategies like outsourcing to counter these issues and maintain their competitiveness globally. However, outsourcing isn’t a foolproof alternative. If you are choosing it, you are at the risk of loss of control, reduced quality, and too much dependence on external partners. This brings us to our other option which is fairly better and keeps you in control of your business while also saving money– Factory relocation to CEE countries like Slovakia, Czechia, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Serbia etc. This region is proving to be a goldmine for operations. Here, we’ll explore why CEE factory relocation to counter deindustrialization of Germany is a more stable and effective solution than outsourcing for businesses. Let’s move further to understand how moving factories to this high-potential region can transform German companies and provide the operational stability they need to survive and thrive amid tough times. Understanding the Severe Impact of Deindustrialization on German Companies Germany, which was once an industrial example setter, is now undergoing a growing phase of deindustrialization. Its industries are deeply affected by factors like high energy prices, stringent regulations, supply chain disruptions, and shifting labor markets. Hence, it’s common for your business to face difficulties sustaining production at competitive levels. This is clearly visible in energy-intensive sectors such as automotive, steel, and chemical, where the rising costs of electricity and gas have forced businesses to reevaluate their operations. The energy costs in Germany have been among the highest in Europe recently, which directly hits manufacturing competitiveness.  Businesses have already begun moving operations abroad. This has raised alarms about the country’s long-term industrial future and prompted many firms to look for solutions closer to home, with CEE countries emerging as a prime option for relocation. However, some businesses have chosen ‘outsourcing’ to deal with the chaos. Why Outsourcing is Not the Ideal Way to Counter Deindustrialization in Germany? Outsourcing operations to distant locations like Asia or South America has been a common strategy for reducing costs used by German companies. However, there are certain risks involved. The loss of control over critical aspects of the business is the most threatening one. A major concern is the difficulty in maintaining quality standards when production is outsourced. German companies, known for their engineering precision and high-quality standards, often find that quality declines when manufacturing is moved to lower-cost countries with less stringent regulatory environments. Your business can face problems like inconsistent product quality, delayed deliveries, and difficulties in implementing new techniques and innovations. Additionally, communication barriers are unavoidable when outsourcing to regions with different languages, cultures, and time zones. This can result in project delays, misunderstandings, and an overall reduction in operational efficiency.  The further you move production from the company’s base, the harder it is to manage day-to-day activities and maintain alignment with the company’s strategic goals. More importantly, outsourcing poses risks to data security and intellectual property. In regions with weaker legal protections for intellectual property German companies may face challenges in safeguarding their designs, processes, and innovations.  Your business might be at the risk of costly legal battles that are devastating or even encounter the unauthorized use of proprietary technology by others, often giving rise to immortal competitors. How Factory Relocation to Central and Eastern Europe Countries Emerge as a Better Alternative? Experts have chosen factory relocation to CEE countries as a far more stable alternative to outsourcing. It allows German companies to retain greater control over their operations. This region offers a favorable business environment with proximity to Germany, making oversight and collaborations easier. The geography and culture of this region are incredibly similar to Germany, which leaves space for minimal logistical challenges and communication barriers compared to primary outsourcing locations which have varying cultures and geographies. Additionally, the regulatory frameworks in CEE countries properly align with EU standards. This ensures that your business can maintain the same level of quality and innovation control that it achieved with domestic operations, reducing the chances of diminished quality or innovation delays. Companies can supervise production and implement changes more effectively. Countries like Poland, the Czech Republic, and Hungary have also made significant investments in infrastructure and workforce training, making them attractive destinations for factory relocations. And you still have the option to stay in Europe, but outside of the EU regulation when you decide to relocate your factory to Serbia, North Macedonia, or Bosnia and Herzegovina. Cost Effectiveness Without Compromising Control Outsourcing might seem a cost-effective option but its long-term financial and operational risks clearly outweigh the short-term savings. On the contrary, CEE factory relocation allows companies to achieve cost savings without the risks associated with outsourcing. The talent in CEE countries is ready to work at significantly lower rates than the one in Germany. However, it holds the same or even better level of technical expertise and working morale. This lets German companies reduce operational expenses without sacrificing quality and control. For instance, Poland has seen increased foreign investment from German companies due to its competitive labor markets, strong industrial base, and well-developed transport links to Western Europe. Regulatory Advantages and Compliance Management CEE countries offer a robust regulatory alignment with strict EU standards. Unlike prime outsourcing destinations, CEE countries adhere to strict data security, labor, and environmental regulations to make sure that German companies continue to meet the high standards required by European and global markets. This is especially important for industries with sensitive intellectual property or stringent regulatory requirements, such as automotive or aerospace manufacturing.  By relocating to CEE, German companies can maintain compliance with EU regulations, minimizing legal and operational risks while ensuring that their innovations remain protected. Mitigates Potential Risks Once the leader of industrialization, Germany is now undergoing a phase of deindustrialization, leaving businesses worried about potential risks and mishaps. The cost of production is rising

Od sejne sobe do prodajne dvorane popravljamo, gradimo in pospešujemo rast, medtem ko vi ostajate pod nadzorom in izven nadzora. V središču pozornosti!

Meni

Rešitve

Strokovno znanje

Funkcije

Linkedin-in Youtube

Poljska | Češka | Slovaška | Slovenija | Hrvaška | Madžarska | Romunija | Bolgarija | Srbija | Črna gora | Bosna in Hercegovina | Severna Makedonija | ZDA | Mehika | Kanada | Nemčija | Združeni arabski emirati | Savdska Arabija

© 2025 CE Interim Management Group.

sl_SISlovenščina
en_USEnglish de_DE_formalDeutsch (Sie) fr_FRFrançais it_ITItaliano pl_PLPolski ro_RORomână cs_CZČeština sk_SKSlovenčina hu_HUMagyar es_ESEspañol ru_RUРусский arالعربية sl_SISlovenščina