POR QUÉ CE INTERIM
Construido por operarios.
Con la confianza de los consejos.
No desempeñamos papeles. Dirigimos misiones.
25+
Países a través de Valtus Alliance
DÓNDE OPERAMOS
Despliegue ejecutivo provisional
en los 5 continentes.
De Europa al Golfo, pasando por las Américas: altos cargos desplegados localmente.
5
Continentes y crecimiento
¿Necesita un liderazgo ejecutivo interino en un mercado específico?Hable con un socio regional
PARA DIRECTIVOS INTERINOS
Su próximo mandato
empieza aquí.
CE Interim conecta a altos ejecutivos interinos con mandatos de alto impacto en Europa, América y Oriente Medio.
60,000+
Ejecutivos interinos en nuestra red mundial
CENTRO DE CONOCIMIENTO
Ideas de los operadores,
no los observadores.
Editorial, investigación e inteligencia de ejecutivos que han estado en la sala.
25k+
Lectores mensuales

EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP · INTERIM CIO

An Interim CIO with authority over the systems and the vendors.

CE Interim appoints proven Interim CIOs to take charge of technology when an implementation has failed, a platform has become unstable, a separation requires a standalone stack, or the IT function has lost its leadership.

Confidencialidad desde el primer contacto. Un ejecutivo previamente seleccionado y que se ajusta al perfil del puesto, listo para incorporarse en un plazo de 72 horas tras la finalización del informe del mandato.

La línea jerárquica

CEO · CFO · BOARD

↑
respuestas a

INTERIM CIO

↓
conduce a

SYSTEMS · INFRASTRUCTURE · DATA · SECURITY · IT TEAM

Systems under control
Vendor accountability
Partner-led governance
72-hour readiness

1,500+

Encargos entregados al año en toda la alianza

90+

Socios operativos en todo el mundo

30+

Países incluidos

95%

Mandatos transfronterizos

72 horas

Desde el informe inicial hasta el inicio de la misión

Definición

What is an Interim CIO?

An Interim CIO is an experienced technology executive appointed for a defined period to take control of the systems the business
depends on: the platform estate, the implementation programme, the vendors delivering it, the data, the security posture and the
IT function itself.

The appointment is made when technology has become a business risk rather than a business function. That can mean an
implementation that has stalled, a platform that is not stable, a separation that requires standing up a stack from nothing, or a
departure that has left the function without direction at the worst moment.

An Interim CIO is accountable for whether the systems work, not for whether the business changes how it uses them. Where the risk is adoption rather than delivery, a different appointment is the right one.

Condiciones de activación de citas

When businesses appoint an Interim CIO

01

An ERP implementation has stalled or been paused

The programme is behind, over budget, or has stopped. Restarting it needs someone who will take the decisions the original programme avoided and hold the implementation partner to what was contracted.

02

A system went live and the business cannot rely on it

Month-end will not close cleanly, the shopfloor is working around the system, and the data coming out of it is not trusted by the people who have to act on it.

03

The CIO has gone and the estate has no owner

Departure or extended absence. Continuity, security, vendor contracts and the live programme all continue regardless. In CE Interim’s experience a permanent appointment takes three to five months, and the appointee then serves notice before inheriting
an estate they have to learn.

04

A carve-out needs its own stack

A separated business is running on systems it does not own, under a transitional services agreement with exit dates and escalating renewal costs. Replacement capability has to be stood up against those dates.

05

Two acquired estates have to become one

Duplicate platforms, incompatible data structures and two IT teams. The consolidation case exists and nobody is sequencing it against what the operation can absorb.

06

A security incident has exposed the posture

A breach, a near miss or an audit finding has shown that the controls were assumed rather than verified, and the response needs executive ownership rather than a remediation list.

07

Vendors are running the agenda

Contracts, scope and timelines are being set by implementation partners because nobody internal has the standing or the technical depth to challenge them.

08

The data is not fit for what the business now wants to do

Reporting, analytics or automation initiatives are stalling on data quality, ownership and governance that were never established.

¿Es este el asiento correcto?

Does the situation require an Interim CIO?

The determining question is whether the technology is the problem, or whether the technology works and the business has not changed around it.

Appoint an Interim CIO when:

Regla de decisión

When the risk is whether the systems work, appoint a CIO. When the systems work and the business has gone back to its old process, the risk is adoption and a different appointment addresses it.

Cuando lo adecuado es desempeñar otra función

 Where the programme spans functions and the question is whether the organisation adopts the change, an Interim Transformation and Programme Director carries the mandate and the CIO supports the technical delivery inside it.

Where the failure is that finance cannot produce reliable numbers, an Interim CFO leads and technology is one input

Where a system change has destabilised a plant, an Interim Plant Manager restores operational control while the system question is resolved separately. 

CE Interim define primero el mandato y, a continuación, recomienda la función.

Comparación de funciones

Which role does the business need?

Desplaza la tabla hacia los lados →

Interim CIO Directora interina de Transformación y Programas Interim CFO Implementation partner
Posee Systems, vendors, security, the IT function The programme and its adoption Reporting, cash, governance The build
Risk addressed The system does not work The change does not embed The numbers cannot be trusted Delivery to contract
Autoridad Held, inside technology Borrowed, across functions Held, inside finance Contractual
Nombrado cuando Technology has become a business risk Nobody owns delivery end to end Finance needs executive authority The scope is defined
Accountable to CEO, CFO or board The programme sponsor Board or sponsor The contract
Hora de empezar En un plazo de 72 horas desde la presentación del escrito En un plazo de 72 horas desde la presentación del escrito En un plazo de 72 horas desde la presentación del escrito Once a statement of work is signed

Interim CIO

Posee Systems, vendors, security, the IT function
Risk addressed The system does not work
Autoridad Held, inside technology
Nombrado cuando Technology has become a business risk
Accountable to CEO, CFO or board
Hora de empezar En un plazo de 72 horas desde la presentación del escrito

Directora interina de Transformación y Programas

Posee The programme and its adoption
Risk addressed The change does not embed
Autoridad Borrowed, across functions
Nombrado cuando Nobody owns delivery end to end
Accountable to The programme sponsor
Hora de empezar En un plazo de 72 horas desde la presentación del escrito

Interim CFO

Posee Reporting, cash, governance
Risk addressed The numbers cannot be trusted
Autoridad Held, inside finance
Nombrado cuando Finance needs executive authority
Accountable to Board or sponsor
Hora de empezar En un plazo de 72 horas desde la presentación del escrito

Implementation partner

Posee The build
Risk addressed Delivery to contract
Autoridad Contractual
Nombrado cuando The scope is defined
Accountable to The contract
Hora de empezar Once a statement of work is signed

Modos de fallo

Por qué fracasan estas citas

The ERP problem is treated as an IT problem.

A CIO is appointed to fix a failing implementation, and does. The platform stabilises, the interfaces work, the data flows. The business continues to operate the way it did before, because nobody was accountable for changing that. The system is now correct and unused, which is more expensive than either outcome alone.

The rollout is restarted with the governance that failed it.

The programme is relaunched with a new plan, the same steering structure, the same decision route and the same reluctance to say no to scope. Restarting without changing why it stalled risks producing a second stall for the same underlying reasons. 

A separation is sequenced by preference rather than by exit date.

Systems are replaced in the order the team would prefer to tackle them, rather than in the order the transitional services agreement requires. The result is renewal at escalating cost for the services nobody got to in time. 

The vendor is treated as a partner rather than a counterparty.

Scope, timeline and acceptance are set by the implementation partner because nobody internal has the technical depth to challenge them. The programme delivers what was easy to deliver, and the business discovers the gap at go-live.

Ámbito de competencia

What an Interim CIO mandate should include

Una línea jerárquica específica, acordada antes de comenzar.

Whether the executive reports to the CEO, the CFO or the board determines what can be decided without referral, and in a recovery the referral interval is where the cost accumulates.

Architecture and platform authority.

The right to decide what is built, bought, retained or retired. A recovery mandate that excludes the architecture decision is a mandate to manage a problem rather than to resolve it.

Vendor accountability.

The executive is the counterparty to implementation partners, with authority over scope, change control, escalation and acceptance. Acceptance in particular belongs to the business rather than to the party being paid to deliver.

Authority to stop and re-scope.

The right to pause a workstream, remove scope or delay a go-live where the business cannot absorb it. Recovery often requires less to be delivered rather than more.

Security and continuity ownership.

Accountability for the posture as it actually is rather than as documented, including the authority to act on what an assessment finds. 

Authority over the IT function.

The ability to reallocate responsibility, address capability gaps and hold internal and external teams to the same standard.

Nota de autoridad

Authority must be proportional to the decisions the mandate requires in its first thirty days. In a stalled implementation the daily cost continues while approval is sought, and the vendor keeps invoicing throughout.

Responsabilidad legal, ámbito de aplicación y cobertura

Responsabilidad legal.

Where the mandate requires it, the executive may receive defined signature authority over contracts, change control and acceptance, delegated statutory duties or, where formally appointed and permitted by the local corporate structure, a statutory position. The scope is agreed before the start rather than assumed.

El alcance se acuerda antes de que el ejecutivo comience su labor.

El cliente, CE Interim y el ejecutivo definen por escrito las funciones, la separación de funciones, los límites y los límites de firma. No se asume ninguna autoridad ni responsabilidad desde el primer momento.

El seguro se contrata por cada mandato.

Los ejecutivos interinos cuentan con su propia cobertura de responsabilidad civil para consejeros, directivos y profesionales. En algunos encargos, es el cliente quien la proporciona o contribuye a ella. CE Interim y todos los miembros de Valtus Alliance también cuentan con su propia cobertura.

Arco de mandato

How an Interim CIO mandate unfolds

Usually appointed into something already running. A common pattern, not a fixed methodology.

01

Taking control

Establish the real state

Separate what is reported from what is true: programme status, platform stability, data quality, security posture and vendor position. Identify what is at immediate risk, whether that is a go-live, a service exit or an exposure. Stop anything that is making it worse. 

02

Stabilising

Decide and re-scope

Take the architecture and scope decisions the programme has been deferring. Reduce delivery to what the business can absorb and what the timetable genuinely requires. Reset the vendor relationship: scope, change control, escalation and acceptance criteria in writing. 

03

Rebuilding

Deliver and hand over

Complete the delivery on the revised scope. Establish the operating model, the support structure and the governance the permanent function will inherit. Brief the successor on what was found as well as what was fixed.

RECOVERY OR SEPARATION MANDATE · 9 TO 18 MONTHS

Decision authority and recovery cadence are established inside thirty days. In CE Interim’s experience, three months is the minimum period in which meaningful change can usually be demonstrated, because a platform only proves it is stable by closing consecutive periods on it.

Sustitución por baja · De 6 a 12 meses

Where the mandate holds the estate through a gap, the mandate runs to the permanent appointment

Habla con un socio sobre el mandato antes de que la situación te obligue a definirlo.

Resultados y traspaso

What effective interim technology leadership should achieve

Estabilidad

The systems the business runs on behave predictably, and the people who depend on them stop building workarounds.

Trusted data

 The numbers coming out of the system are the numbers the business acts on, without parallel spreadsheets.

Vendors under contract

Implementation partners deliver to agreed scope, and acceptance is a business decision rather than a formality.

A defensible posture

Security and continuity reflect what has been verified rather than what was assumed.

A function that can be led

The IT team has structure, ownership and a standard, so the permanent CIO inherits an organisation rather than a backlog. 

Entrega

The architecture decisions, the vendor position and the operating model are documented and transferred to named people. Continuity without dependency.

A quién enviamos

The Interim CIOs we appoint

Has recovered an implementation, not only run one.

Has taken over a programme that was already failing, decided what to cut, and delivered the remainder. Recovery requires a different judgement set from steady-state delivery.

Has stood up a stack against a separation deadline.

Knows that a transitional services agreement is the schedule, has replaced services against exit dates, and has been in the renewal conversation where the cost escalates.

Has held an implementation partner to contract.

Has challenged scope, refused an acceptance and renegotiated a change control with a vendor whose commercial interest ran the other way. Acceptance is a business decision, and the willingness to withhold it is what makes the contract mean anything.

Understands what the plant actually does.

Production, quality and planning systems behave differently from commercial ones. A technically correct solution can still fail operationally if it does not fit how the shopfloor actually works.

Has said no to a go-live date.

Has delayed a launch because the business was not ready, held that position against a programme timeline and a vendor invoice, and been right.

CE Interim works through more than 90 operating partners across the Valtus Alliance, in over 30 countries. Where a workstream needs an additional specialist midstream, CE Interim can draw one from the same network.

El modelo de citas

De una reunión informativa confidencial al nombramiento de un directivo

01

Resumen de la situación

 A Partner conversation under NDA, typically with a Partner who has held a technology leadership role. Where the programme or estate stands, where execution is broken, and what authority can be delegated.

02

Mandate definition and challenge-specific assessment

 CE Interim defines the systems in scope, the stage, the blockers and the critical outcomes, then interviews each executive for this situation rather than against a generic technology profile.

03

Presentation, appointment and governance

You receive one or two pre-vetted executives matched to the challenge, not a CV list. Weekly Partner check-ins and milestone tracking follow. 

Tensión transfronteriza

Why cross-border technology mandates are harder to govern

What headquarters needs

What each site needs

Local teams may not escalate a platform decision they disagree with. They can adopt the parts that fit and work around the rest, and the workaround becomes the process. An Interim CIO has to be present enough at the sites to see what is actually being used.

Ámbitos en los que trabajamos con mayor frecuencia

De Alemania a Polonia
De Alemania a la República Checa y Hungría
De Europa Occidental a Europa Central y Oriental
De Europa Occidental a Estados Unidos
De Estados Unidos a Europa Central
Inversión de capital riesgo internacional en una empresa local de la cartera

Módulos de situación

Typical Interim CIO mandates

Programas de transformación de importancia crítica para la empresa

An implementation has stalled or gone live without stabilising. The mandate is to take the deferred decisions, reduce scope to what is achievable, and deliver a platform the business can rely on.

Integración tras la fusión y escisión

A separated business needs its own systems against fixed exit dates, or two estates have to consolidate. The mandate is sequenced against the transitional services agreement rather than preference.

Puesto vacante de liderazgo clave

The technology function has no owner while continuity, security and a live programme all continue. The mandate is to hold the estate and hand over cleanly.

Governance, Visibility and Control

Security posture, data governance or vendor management have become risks the board can see and nobody owns. The mandate is to make the position verifiable.

Entornos sectoriales

Where CE Interim appoints Interim CIOs

Sectores primarios

Fabricación e industria
Automoción
Aeroespacial y Defensa
Farmacia, ciencias de la vida y dispositivos médicos

También se sirven

Productos químicos
Elaboración de alimentos y bebidas
Energía
Productos de gran consumo
Logística
Construcción e inmobiliaria
Tecnología y medios de comunicación

Entornos de propiedad

Empresas de la cartera de capital riesgo
Grupos empresariales y sedes internacionales
Empresas del «Mittelstand» y grupos industriales del mercado medio
Participaciones industriales

Sector understanding matters because a manufacturing estate carries production, quality and planning systems that behave differently from a purely commercial environment, and technically sound decisions can still fail operationally if they do not fit how the plant actually works.

Pruebas del caso

Technology mandates in practice

Global materials group · More than 150 years of history · Present in more than thirty countries · Intervention across ten Polish sites

Group ERP template deployed across ten locations in Poland

Situación

A group ERP template was being rolled out into the Polish entities as part of a wider group transformation, governed centrally and delivered locally through an implementation partner, against a fixed go-live.

Mandato

CE Interim appointed an interim executive to own the programme locally: holding the partner to scope, coordinating ten sites with different operating realities, and getting the business ready rather than only the system.

Resultado

The rollout moved from a centrally driven system implementation to a locally owned business programme. Ten sites were brought into one governance cadence, the implementation partner was held to scope, and readiness issues were resolved before they could become go-live failures. Local management entered the transition with clear accountability for adoption, not just technical delivery.

European industrial manufacturer · Food, pharmaceutical and defence markets · Publicly listed group · Around 200 people

Finance systems stabilised after an ERP go-live at a Czech site

Situación

 A new ERP platform had gone live and, in the words of the brief, had gone worst in finance. The close had become dependent on workarounds, the team was producing by hand what the system should have produced, and the finance leader had departed in the middle of it.

Mandato

Stabilise the reporting inside the system as implemented, and separate what finance could fix from what required the platform to change. 

Resultado

The finance function was brought back under control without waiting for a complete ERP redesign. Reporting was stabilised inside the live system, manual workarounds were reduced, and the remaining platform defects were isolated and assigned clearly. Management regained dependable financial visibility while the business continued operating.

Coste y duración

What an Interim CIO mandate costs and how long it runs

Los mandatos se facturan según una tarifa diaria en función del alcance, la autoridad y la duración. No se aplica ningún porcentaje sobre el salario, ni comisión por colocación, ni inversión inicial. Se pagan los días trabajados según lo acordado en el mandato, y la tarifa se confirma antes de que el ejecutivo comience a trabajar.

Tarifa diaria orientativa

1.000 € – 3.000 €

Mayor cuando el encargo conlleva un cargo regulado por ley o presenta complejidades transfronterizas.

Duración y hitos

Recovery or separation mandate

Nine to eighteen months

Sustitución por baja

De seis a doce meses

Decision authority and recovery cadence established

Inside thirty days

Directivo presente en las instalaciones

En un plazo de 72 horas tras la finalización del informe

¿Qué influye en la cifra?.

The scale of the estate and the number of sites and countries on it. Whether a recovery, a separation or a consolidation is in scope. Whether vendor renegotiation sits inside the mandate. Whether the security posture has to be re established rather than reviewed. Every mandate is delivered on site.

Con qué se debe comparar.

Not the cost of the mandate, but the cost of the situation continuing without an accountable executive while decisions are deferred.

Lo que realmente vas a pagar.

Un socio te da una cifra en la primera conversación confidencial. Sin coste alguno ni compromiso alguno.

Preguntas

Questions boards and sponsors ask

CIO where the risk is whether the systems work. Transformation Director where the systems work and the risk is whether the business adopts the change. Many programmes need both, with the mandates defined so they do not overlap.

Not for this role and not for transformation. The market reads CTO as Chief Technology Officer, and CE Interim writes roles out in full rather than using an acronym that attracts the wrong reader.

Yes, and it is a common mandate. Restarting successfully means changing why it stalled, not relaunching the same plan with a new date. That may require cutting scope and resetting the vendor relationship.

Yes, as the counterparty rather than as a coordinator. Scope, change control, escalation and acceptance sit with the business, and acceptance in particular is not a decision to leave with the party being paid to deliver. 

That changes the mandate rather than ending it. Where the existing IT team has the capability but lacks leadership or decision authority, the interim leads the team already in place and focuses the mandate on direction, governance and execution.

For industrial businesses, yes. Production, quality and planning systems behave differently from commercial ones, and decisions taken without that understanding are worked around on the floor regardless of their technical merit.

It should. Recovery often requires delivering less rather than more, and the authority to remove scope or delay a go-live has to be part of the mandate rather than an escalation.

CE Interim structures mandates on a business-to-business basis, and the interim executive does not join the client as a permanent employee. The contracting party is a local entity or a regional hub depending on the country of intervention, drawn from more than thirty entities across the Valtus Alliance. Employment-status, tax, social-security and related obligations depend on the jurisdiction, the contracting structure and the circumstances of the mandate, so the engagement is structured for the country in which the work is performed.

Insurance is arranged per mandate. The executive carries their own directors’ and officers’ and professional liability cover, and on some mandates the client provides or contributes to it. CE Interim and every member of the Valtus Alliance carries its own cover as well. The scope of responsibility, the boundaries and the signature limits are agreed in writing by the client, CE Interim and the executive before the executive starts.

A vetted, mandate-matched executive is ready to start within 72 hours of the completed mandate brief. Where a workstream needs an additional specialist midstream, CE Interim can draw one from the same network.

It can be. Recovery normally starts by establishing why the programme is behind, what the business can realistically absorb and whether the current scope is still defensible. That may mean cutting scope, resetting the vendor relationship and re-sequencing delivery around operational readiness rather than the milestone chart. Relaunching the same plan without addressing the reasons it stalled risks repeating the same failure.

The interim executive, as the counterparty rather than a coordinator. Scope, change control, escalation and acceptance all sit with the business. Leaving acceptance with the party being paid to deliver is how programmes go live on paper and fail in use.

A deliberate handover. Architecture decisions, the vendor position and the operating model are documented and transferred to named people, so the permanent CIO inherits an organisation rather than a backlog.

When CIO authority is missing, delay becomes a decision in itself.

Habla directamente con un socio interino de CE sobre la situación de liderazgo, el mandato y la autoridad necesaria. La conversación es confidencial y no te compromete a aceptar ningún nombramiento.

Respuesta de los socios en un plazo de 24 horas. Se da prioridad a las situaciones urgentes relacionadas con el liderazgo.

CE INTERINO

Plataforma de gestión interina de ejecutivos

Soy un..

Cliente / Empresa

Contratación de directivos interinos

Director interino

En busca de mandatos