CBAM für Hersteller: Dekarbonisieren, umschichten oder verlagern

Nicht genug Zeit, um den ganzen Artikel zu lesen? Hören Sie sich die Zusammenfassung in 2 Minuten an.

The Carbon Border Tax Is No Longer a Concept. It’s a Cost.

If you manufacture outside the EU and sell into it, your factory is now part of the emissions debate – whether you like it or not.

The EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) is no longer theory. It’s in force. And while full charges won’t kick in until 2026, reporting already started in 2023.

Companies have barely a year to reshape supply chains, decarbonize operations, or risk becoming uncompetitive in one of the world’s largest markets.

This isn’t a climate conversation. It’s a business one.

What CBAM Actually Means for You

CBAM targets imported products in carbon-intensive sectors: steel, aluminum, cement, hydrogen, fertilizers, and electricity. More sectors will likely be added over time.

What’s changing?

Exporters now need to declare embedded emissions in these products and – starting 2026 – pay a levy equal to what an EU producer would have paid under the EU Emissions Trading System. The logic is simple: if you emit more, you pay more.

And the process isn’t soft. The EU won’t accept vague estimates or goodwill declarations.

You’ll need:

Verified emissions data from your factory or suppliers
Transparent product-level carbon calculations
An accountable compliance system linked to your EU importer

For many companies, that means a complete rethink of how and where they manufacture.

Not Just a Tax – A Strategic Filter

CBAM isn’t just a financial hit. It’s a market filter.

The mechanism essentially penalizes products made in countries with low carbon prices or loose environmental regulations. That puts a direct cost on old manufacturing methods – and changes the math on sourcing, production, and pricing.

Companies that adapt will keep their EU customers.

Those that wait will lose access – or lose margin.

Three Real Options for Industrial Manufacturers

You can’t opt out. But you can decide how to respond.

Here are the three real-world strategies industrial firms are now considering:

i) Decarbonize at the Source

The most straightforward – and capital-intensive – move is to invest in greener production where you are.

That could mean:

Shifting to renewable energy for your plant
Installing carbon capture systems
Overhauling outdated furnaces, kilns, or casting lines
Improving energy efficiency at every level

This approach allows companies to keep their current footprint but lower the carbon intensity of what they produce.

However, it requires time, upfront investment, and credible measurement systems. It also requires leadership alignment and often, new capabilities.

Some firms have appointed interim transformation executives to fast-track the transition without overloading the current team – a tactic we’ve seen work well in urgent ESG realignment cases.

ii) Reshuffle the Supply Chain

For companies with complex sourcing networks, the play isn’t always to change the factory. Sometimes it’s about shifting what comes in and goes out.

Examples include:

Sourcing raw materials from lower-emissions producers
Shifting energy-intensive processing to countries with cleaner grids
Adjusting production flows so only “CBAM-friendly” goods are routed to EU clients

This is a logistics-heavy strategy – and one that demands real coordination between procurement, operations, and commercial teams.

We’ve seen manufacturers appoint interim supply chain specialists or carbon reporting experts to lead these reshuffles.

When time is short and stakes are high, relying on existing teams (already under pressure) often leads to missed compliance windows or customer disruption.

iii) Relocate Production (Near or Within the EU)

The most drastic – but often the most strategic – move is relocation.

For firms already considering EU expansion, CBAM could tip the scale. Moving final processing steps, finishing lines, or even full production inside the EU removes the CBAM exposure altogether.

We’re seeing early movement in sectors like aluminum processing, steel parts, and cement-based prefabrication. Even partial reshoring can drastically reduce exposure, especially if paired with local renewable energy sources or low-carbon tech parks.

Of course, relocation isn’t easy. It demands site selection, permitting, workforce planning, and capex execution – all while maintaining continuity in existing markets.

This is where interim execution partners, like CE Interim, come in. Companies bring in relocation project managers or industrial operations leads to plan and execute these transitions while keeping disruption minimal.

What Happens If You Ignore It?

The real danger isn’t just the levy. It’s the loss of customer trust and commercial viability.

Here’s what’s already happening in your buyers’ offices:

Procurement teams are reevaluating supply chain carbon footprints
Buyers are asking for embedded carbon declarations before CBAM requires it
Major EU manufacturers are asking non-EU suppliers for compliance timelines

If your team can’t answer those questions clearly – or worse, hasn’t started preparing – you’re already behind.

Common Gaps That Hurt Manufacturers Most

Some manufacturers think they’re safe. But even technically strong firms get caught out when carbon reporting becomes mandatory. Here’s where many go wrong:

i) No ownership: ESG and sustainability often sit in marketing, not operations. But CBAM is an operations issue.

ii) Assumed exemption: Some think their country will be exempt. It won’t be. Only actual carbon pricing mechanisms count.

iii) Fake readiness: They think suppliers have data. But most suppliers aren’t ready to provide product-level emissions data — especially in Asia and the Middle East.

iv) Overconfidence in consulting: A consulting report doesn’t replace systems, audits, or accountable leadership. Execution wins here.

v) Waiting for group HQ: Many regional plants are stuck waiting for global sustainability teams to act — which could be too late.

How to Move Now – Without Losing Time

CBAM is a systems problem and a leadership problem. That’s why the firms adapting fastest are doing three things:

1. Appointing a single executive lead:

Someone with the authority to make decisions, coordinate functions, and report to the board.

2. Bringing in external help where needed:

Von carbon accounting platforms to interim carbon compliance leads, companies are borrowing capabilities instead of building them from scratch.

3. Starting with one core product line:

Trying to decarbonize everything at once is a trap. Start with your EU-facing product line – and prove the model.

You don’t need a strategy workshop. You need a clear owner, a 6-month execution window, and access to capabilities you don’t currently have.

CE Interim helps industrial companies do just that – from deploying interim carbon specialists to leading partial site moves in carbon-sensitive sectors.